The difficulty lay in the fact that certain truths require authorization to be admitted in court.
The moment everything changed:
When my father had finally finished his speech, his lawyer stepped forward confidently.
“These documents confirm,” he stated, “that no company corresponding to the defendant’s employer is registered in a verifiable registry. Therefore, the defendant falsified employment in order to access the trust funds.”
The jurors nodded slowly.
From their point of view, the story made perfect sense.
Then Daniel stood up.
“Your Honor,” he said calmly, “the defense wishes to produce a supporting document.”
The opposing party’s lawyer immediately objected.
The investigation was already closed.



